In the play, Macbeth,
by William Shakespeare, Macbeth kills the king, causing he himself to be the
successor. As king, Macbeth makes many people, all of whom have much less power
than him, commit multiple homicides in order to prevent anyone from stealing his
title as king. He shows no sympathy towards his new kingdom, plotting to kill
many people, and no one can step up to stop him, fearing him. Macbeth can
greatly compare to the article mentioned above, especially with the idea of
being powerful.
The article Can
You Learn Anything from a Void” by
Adam Kirsch considers two different scenarios that occurred during Holocaust,
both considering men who chose to be involved illegal or questionable acts. In
one scenario, a man named Victor Capesius is depicted as a “stocky” man in a
bathing suit waiting for his swimming lessons. He was a sales representative for
“the pharmaceutical company Bayer,” and according to a girl, Ella Boehm, he was
a very sweet man. However, when the disaster called the Holocaust began, he was
one of the men who directed people to the Auschwitz
concentration camp. After Ella and her family were deported from Hungary and taken to Auschwitz , they encountered Capesius for the last time, as he
directed her family toward the gas chambers, and Ella toward the camp. Ella and
her family were not the only ones to see Capesius at the camp, directing them
toward their death. His friends and
neighbors went through the camp as well, and unfortunately he directed them gas
chambers also. All throughout the Holocaust, Capesius acted as though he
was happy and did not mind sending thousands of people to their deaths. “Capesius
could not even claim to be blinded by ideological anti-Semitism.” When he was tried in 1964, his prosecutor said
Capesius should have gone through a terrible emotional state, confronting
people he knew who trusted him, and the prosecutor compared his actions to that
of a monster’s.
The second scenario contains a selection of letters written
by Konrad Jarausch. Jarausch is depicted as a bookish and introverted man, and “one
of the least soldierly soldiers of Hitler’s army.” He was a Protestant and a
trainer of Christian teachers, who also edited the journal, School and Church. He was too old for
the army so he was sent to guard prisoners of war in Poland , later moving to Germany to train new recruits. His letters tell readers that the
last six months of his life were desperate and depressed. Jarausch believed
Hitler’s war was a disaster. Jarausch found sympathy toward the prisoner of war
he was guarding, finding much in common with them. He found a sense of respect
for them, with incredibly different views compared to Capesius.
In all three cases, the main character is in a state of
superiority over his community. In the case of Macbeth and Capesius, they are
taking it a bit too far. People are responsible for stepping up and facing them
to fix the problem that is occurring. However, it is a matter which can be left
up to the onlooker. He or she can either act in an evil way to save him or
herself, or choose the opposite and deal with the consequences. Those who carry
out unfair executions and murders are just as guilty as anyone else, because
they chose evil to save themselves. By fighting for their beliefs, bystanders
can fight the evil and overcome it.
Hi Michele,
ReplyDeleteNice response to the writing prompt. I enjoyed your thorough overview of the article. In the article, we really do see two differing models of how to act in the face of an atrocity like the Holicaust. Even so, Kirsch seems to condemn Jarausch somewhat for his unwillingness to more actively defend Jewish people from the horrors of concentration camps. You did well to connect the article to our reading of the play. Additionally, I enjoyed your final assertion: that bystanders--by staying true to their moral convictions--can fight and overcome evil. Good job.